Top of the page.
Skip the menu to main contents.
Move to main menu.
Skip to main contents.
Main menu starts here.
Skip the main menu to current location in your website.
Current location in your website.
Skip to main contents.
Start main contents.

  • Stock Price

Environmental Burdens

 

Environmental burdens of the Fujifilm Group

This material flow system summarizes resource inputs and emissions associated with R&D, development, and product distribution across the entire Fujifilm Group.

Environmental burdens of the Fujifilm Group (Fiscal 2010)

[image] Environmental burdens of the Fujifilm Group (Fiscal 2010)

Analyzing environmental burden for the entire Fujifilm Group by LCA (Life Cycle Assessment)

The Fujifilm Group's CO2 emissions in fiscal 2010

[image] CO2 emissions for the Fujifilm Group (Fiscal 2010)

Eco-Efficiency from Fiscal 2005 to Fiscal 2010 (Fiscal 2000 as base year)

Eco-efficiency: (Eco-efficiency=Revenues / Value for environmental burden):
yellow barOn target (above scheduled target guideline)
blue barAdditional effort required to meet target (below scheduled target guideline)
brown dotTarget

A. Waste Generation

[Image]A. Waste Generation

B. Natural Resources Consumed(*1)

[Image]B. Consumed Natural Resources


C. Atmospheric Emissions of VOCs

[Image]C. Atmospheric Emissions of VOCs

D. Water Consumption

[Image]D. Water Consumption


E. Packing Materials Consumed(*2)

[Image]E. Packing Materials Consumed


  • *1 Materials: Aluminum, TAC, PET, silver and gelatin
  • *2 Materials: Cardboard boxes, paper materials, paper containers, metals, formed plastics, plastic film and sheet and glass

Notes

  • Waste generation: Efforts were made to derive valuable materials from plastic and waste oil at domestic production factories. The amount of waste generated increased particularly at overseas sites.
  • Natural resources consumed: The amount of TAC consumption has increased significantly since 2006 as the flat panel display material business expanded.
  • Atmospheric emissions of VOCs: The amount has been drastically reduced especially at domestic factories in response to the implementation of the PRTR Act.
  • Water consumption: Efficient use of water has been promoted with the introduction of, for example, a multi-stage cascade system.
  • Packing materials consumed: Measures being promoted include reducing the size of packages, using group packaging, conserving resources, and substituting "low-burden" materials.

Overview of fiscal 2010

We have made concerted efforts in fiscal 2010 to improve our eco-efficiency. We established for ourselves a challenging goal to double our eco-efficiency by 2010 relative to the level in 2000, and have aimed to improve eco-efficiency (= revenues / value for environmental burden) in 5 categories. However, the goal has been met only in 2 categories because the 2010 revenue is 30% lower than expected due to effects of the "Lehman shock" in 2008.


Sub-menu starts here.

IR Calendar

FAQs

Back to Top
Footer starts here.
Pages ends here.
Move to top of the page.